National recommendations for responsible researcher evaluation
The national recommendation presents the general principles of researcher evaluation as follows:
- Transparency. The objectives, methods, materials and interpretation of the results must be known to everyone involved in the evaluation. The evaluation must be conducted in a manner that is understood by all parties involved. The evaluation process and all its stages must be clearly and transparently described. The party responsible for the evaluation must ensure that the choices made in the evaluation work are properly reasoned and the evaluation documented in a reliable manner.
- Integrity. Evaluation must be conducted in accordance with practices recognized by the research community, such as integrity, diligence, and accuracy.
- Fairness. All those subject to evaluation must be treated equally and impartially. Evaluation must take into account only relevant factors that have been brought to the attention of all parties concerned. Characteristics or circumstances associated with persons being evaluated or people close to them that are irrelevant to the objective of the evaluation must not be used as evaluation criteria.
- Competence. Evaluators must have the necessary substantive competence and knowledge of the objectives and methods of the evaluation process and with the principles and practices of responsible evaluation of a researcher. In addition to their qualifications, evaluators must not have a conflict of interest and their collective expertise should be diverse.
- Diversity. Evaluation must take into account the diversity of research and outputs.
The recommendation presents good practices in research evaluation
- Building the evaluation
- Evaluation of research
- Diversity of activities
- Researcher’s role in the process
Aalto University is committed to the responsible researcher evaluation.
Have a look at other recommendations on research and researcher assessment
There is a need to improve the ways in which the output of scientific research is evaluated by funding agencies, academic institutions, and other parties. Declaration of Research Assessment, DORA, was one of the first initiatives to improve the ways in which researchers and the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated
Leiden Manifest offers best practice and principles on metrics-based research assessment
Go to Aalto University Research assessments page
Aalto University is continuously assessing the quality of its research and artistic activities, and its societal impact. In the RAI2018 evaluation - Research, Art and Impact Assessment - external experts praised, for instance, the enthusiastic and collaborative work atmosphere, university’s infrastructure, the tenure track career system and the student-driven entrepreneurial ecosystem. The Scientific (and Artistic) Advisory Boards, SAB/SAAB, support the development of each School.