Internationally, prior licence model is known as the Rights Retention Strategy. Researchers retain the right to self-archive their peer-reviewed manuscript (e.g. Author Accepted Manuscript, AAM) without an embargo period and under the Creative Commons license required by the funder in Aalto's publication repository, regardless of any restrictions set by publishers.
The prior licence model applies to manuscripts submitted for review starting 1 January 2026. In practice, it applies only if the article is published behind a paywall and the peer-reviewed manuscript is self-archived in Aalto's publication repository. If the article is published open access in a journal or proceedings under Creative Commons license, there is no need to self-archive the peer-reviewed manuscript.
Prior licence model supports researchers in retaining rights to their peer-reviewed manuscripts and ensures long-term preservation of Aalto University’s research publications. The aim of the prior licence model is to support researchers' possibilities to meet funders' open access requirements even in cases where publisher's policy does not allow self-archiving of the peer-reviewed manuscript without an embargo or under Creative Commons license required by the funder, or paying the open access fee (APC fee) in so-called hybrid journals is not feasible.
Prior Licence Model Introduced in Finnish Universities in 2026 – Finnish University Libraries’ Network
Prior licence model applies to manuscripts of peer-reviewed articles in journals, conference proceedings, and anthologies (publication types A1–A4 in the Ministry of Education and Culture’s publication data collection).
- A1 Journal article (refereed), original research
- A2 Review article, Literature review, Systematic review
- A3 Book section, chapters in research books
- A4 Conference article in proceedings
No. The prior licence model provides researchers with more options for choosing a publication channel. Self-archiving following the prior licence model allows researchers to meet funders' open access requirements even in cases where paying the open access fee (APC fee) in so-called hybrid journals is not feasible, or publisher's policy does not allow self-archiving of the peer-reviewed manuscript without an embargo or under Creative Commons license required by the funder.
You have the possibility to exercise your right to opt-out from the prior licence model, as described in the president's decision. No justification is needed. Opt-out means that the peer-reviewed manuscript will be self-archived following the publisher's terms, including embargo. Opt-out is also possible if one of the co-authors does not approve of self-archiving following Aalto's prior licence model.
Please note that many research funders require immediate open access, whereas a scholarly publisher may not publish in a way that meets this requirement. If you choose to opt-out, it is your responsibility to ensure that you are following your funder’s requirements.
Self-archiving of the peer-reviewed manuscript should be agreed upon with the co-authors, similar to the authors' roles and their order in the article, choice and openness of the publication channel. If any of the co-authors does not approve of self-archiving following Aalto's prior licence model, it is possible to opt-out. In such cases, the peer-reviewed manuscript will be self-archived following the publisher's terms, including embargo. However, please note that many research funders require immediate open access under a CC license.
No, Aalto University will inform publishers about the prior licence model directly and on its web pages.
Yes, you can sign the publishing agreement. The embargo period does not apply as your university's prior licence model precedes the publishing agreement.
Currently, similar policies to prior licence model (internationally known as Rights Retention Strategies) are applied in more than 150 universities, and there are no known cases where researchers affiliated with these institutions have faced legal actions by the publishers.
It is highly unlikely that publishers would pursue legal actions before giving the possibility to remove the peer-reviewed manuscript from the institutional repository. In the event of a dispute concerning interpretation and application of the prior licence model, university is legally responsible for solving it.
Some publishers (e.g. ACS and IEEE) have introduced so-called repository fees. These publishers may charge separate fees for self-archiving of a peer-reviewed manuscript without an embargo, or for the use of a CC license in self-archiving. These fees are not included in open access agreements with publishers.
For more information, please contact: acris@aalto.fi.