Reference list to EMPIRICA’s presentation at KuvA Research Days 2023 “Making things that change”
Reference list
- Biggs, M. (2002). The role of the artefact in art and design research. International journal of design sciences and technology, 10(2), 19–24.
- Dunne, A. (1999). Hertzian tales: electronic products, aesthetic experience and critical design. RCA CRD Research Publications.
- Groth, C. (2015). Emotions in risk-assessment and decision-making processes during craft practice. Journal of Research Practice, 11(2), article M5.
- Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
- Mackey, A., Wakkary, R., Wensveen, S., Tomico, O., & Hengeveld, B. (2017). Day-to-day speculation: Designing and wearing dynamic fabric. In Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Research Through Design Conference, 439–54.
- Mäkelä, M. (2007). Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 20(1), 157–63.
- Mäkelä, M., & Nimkulrat, N. (2018). Documentation as practice-led research tool for reflection on experiential knowledge. FormAkademisk: Research journal of design and design education, 11(1), article 5, 1–16.
- Marqués Ibáñez, A. (2017). An intersection between the fields of education and art: A reflection on the situation of refugees. Research in Arts and Education, 2017(1), 36–49.
- Mattelmäki, T. (2006). Design probes. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Art and Design Helsinki.
- Nimkulrat, N. (2009). Paperness: Expressive material in textile art from an artist’s viewpoint. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Art and Design Helsinki.
- Redström, J., & Wiltse, H. (2018). Changing things: The future of objects in a digital world. Bloomsbury.
- Schmid, H. (2017). Uchronia: time at the intersection of design, chronosociology and chronobiology. PhD thesis, Royal College of Art.
- Seago, A., & Dunne, A. (1999). New methodologies in art and design research: The object as discourse. Design Issues, 15(2), 11–7.
- von Busch, O., and Palmås, K. (2023) The corruption of co-design. Political and social conflicts in participatory design thinking. Taylor & Francis.
- Wensveen, S. (2005). A tangibility approach to affective interaction. Doctoral Dissertation. Delft University of Technology.
Work presented
- Falin, P. (2022). Relating to clay: Tuning in to the workings of the aesthetic dimension in ceramic practice. Aalto University Publication Series, Doctoral Dissertations.
- Hulkkonen, S., Lötjönen, M., & Mäkelä, M. (2023). Sensing the rhythm: Analysing human and non-human movement in a glassblowing process. FormAkademisk: Research journal of design and design education, 16(4).
- Latva-Somppi, R. (2022). Soil laboratory: Crafting experiments in an exhibition setting. In: Fredriksen, B.C., & Groth, C. (Eds.), Expanding environmental awareness in education through the arts. Landscapes: the arts, aesthetics, and education (Vol. 33, pp. 213–29). Springer Nature.
- Suomi, M. & Mäkelä, M. (2023 forthcoming). Architectural practice as a vehicle for exploring relationality in the more than human world [Paper presentation]. VIII Art of Research Conference. Espoo, Finland.
- Vega, L., Mäkelä, M., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2023). Listening to the sociomaterial: When thinking through making extends beyond the individual. Design Studies, 88, 101203.
Read more news
Aalto Inventors turns one: A year of bridging research and real-world impact
Aalto Inventors marks its first anniversary, having engaged 190 researchers across six cohorts in fields including AI, quantum, and biomaterials. New cohorts are planned for the next academic year, stay tuned and join the waitlist.
An architectural project in Milan brought together children’s ideas and the visions of leading architects
Aalto University’s Department of Architecture participated in the international One Earth – House of the Heart project, which was presented in April at Milan Design Week.
Companies disclose more on cybersecurity – but markets remain indifferent
U.S. companies are reporting on cybersecurity in greater detail, yet stock market reactions remain muted. A new study by the University of Vaasa and Aalto University shows that mandatory cybersecurity disclosure does not prompt reactions from investors or stock analysts. Instead, the main benefits appear to materialise within firms themselves.