Graduated physicist Aaro Väkeväinen from the Quantum Dynamics (QD) group received a 2020 School of Science Dissertation Award for his doctoral thesis “Lasing and Bose-Einstein condensation in plasmonic lattices at weak and strong coupling regimes” in the field of nanophotonics. In this article both he and his supervisor reflect on the process and what ultimately led them to success.
In his thesis, Väkeväinen demonstrated strong coupling between light and organic dye molecules in plasmonic nanoparticle arrays, which ultimately led to observation of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) of strongly coupled lattice plasmons. These pioneering results were achieved only by overcoming many experimental challenges. Remarkably, the strongly coupled BEC is formed at record speed of only about 100 femtoseconds at room temperature, and hence required a special measurement technique which Väkeväinen developed. The results are of high scientific interest as the BEC offers a new platform for studies of non-equilibrium quantum phenomena, at room temperature. As the BEC emits a bright light beam with highly tunable properties, applications in future optical and quantum technologies are also possible.
Looking back at this thesis work, Väkeväinen recalls several challenges- some of these were of experimental nature, but others were difficulties experienced by many PhD students. Experimental challenges included identifying a suitable dye molecule that dissolves at high-enough concentration so that strong coupling could be achieved, while also having strong-enough fluorescence to generate the desired lasing or condensation effects. Another practical challenge was to master the alignment of the complicated optical setup. To be able to observe this type of BEC, several tweaks in the settings turned out crucial. Väkeväinen says he identified these critical settings almost accidentally while having to adjust the power of the pump laser.
Other challenges were of a logistic nature- Väkeväinen particularly mentions the sheer amount of data and subsequent handling and analysis. He consciously focused on a strategy whereby he fabricated systematically numerous samples with varied experimental parameters to figure out the required conditions, rather than trying to identify the right optimal parameters beforehand. Väkeväinen reckons that by doing so, he increased his chances to make quite a few interesting unexpected observations that ultimately allowed him to succeed.
Finally, Väkeväinen reflects on some common PhD challenges, namely coping with time pressure to obtain the required results. He adds that his last article in Nature Communications was submitted only one month before submission of his thesis. In practice this meant he was conducting final experiments, writing on his research paper and thesis all at the same time. He stresses that this was only possible with the right support provided by his supervisor and QD colleagues. “Fortunately, I got a lot of support from my professor and colleagues in analyzing the results, making conclusions and writing the article”.
This combined effort led eventually to Väkeväinen’s remarkable output: as part of the thesis, he published altogether five research articles, two of them as first author, in esteemed journals including Nature Communications, Nano Letters and Nature Physics.